At the Andre Galvao seminar last weekend, Marco Nascimento was introducing the World Champion and mentioned his phenomenal progression from novice to elite in just 8 years. Andre's explanation was that he trained "all the time". I have found a similar parallel in reading Marcelo Garcia's introduction in his X Guard book. In it, he mentions how he would train 4 times a day and drive hours to find different people to "test" himself against. For those looking to be the best in the world at anything, I am sure this is the level of dedication it takes, but that is simply not most people (or me). This article is for the other 99% who have jobs, wives, kids, and friends. This is for the people who love jiu-jitsu and training, but realize that it is only a part of their life at this point, and while they may want to train more, they realize that balance is a more suitable objective.
So the question arises, how does one improve without sleeping on the mats?
In my opinion, it comes down to a few things and some simple math. If you have less hours to work on your game, then you must make those hours count. For most people, anywhere from 2 to 6 hours a week of training is realistic. Not a lot to work with, so you absolutely need to focus that time on what matters most, and that means you need a plan. In this effort, I think that focusing on certain concepts can help make your time more productive on the mat.
So what is a good plan?
There is no perfect plan for everyone, but there is a perfect plan for someone (ie. you!). I find this to be a mix of their experience level (belt level) and current skills (strengths and weaknesses). In my opinion, these two things are not equally weighted in creating a plan. One is more general (you are a blue belt) and the other is more personalized (Can you pass guard?). Perhaps counterintuitively, I find belt level to be the best component on which to build a foundation for development as a blue belt. Not that you should ignore your personal game, but that it is of secondary importance in development in the first few years of bjj.
Why should belt level guide my development plan more than my personal strengths and weaknesses?
Frankly for two reasons. First is that your belt is a measurement placed upon you by a 3rd party. Someone else will always have a more detached view of your performance and this makes it highly likely that their evaluation of your skill is more accurate than your personal view. Secondly, there are things at a given belt that you should be doing regardless of what you personally may want to work on at that time. Did you ever notice in school that your bedroom was cleanest during finals? Cleaning, although not very fun, sure seemed like a better alternative than studying all night. In that case, your personal choice of what to do was almost certainly not what you should have been working on.
So is belt level always more important for development than personal game? What about white belts, brown belts, etc?
First I should that I am writing this as a personal process shared for all to see and I am a blue. So in a way I can on'y really speak to what I have been through (white and most of blue). That said, there is method to the madness as I am not sure that for white belts, creating a detailed plan to improve is what they need. Let me explain:
New white belts really are just learning things like position names, what position is "better" than the other, adapting to the closeness of the game, feeling what a submission is, and more. It's habituation. I think at this level you should not be worried about learning anything fancy nor having a specific plan. As a white belt you may think that getting a great X Guard is really important, but I can tell you, it's not. When I was a white belt, I just tried to understand everything I saw and avoid anything that seemed complex. Just getting on the mat, day in, day out, without a plan but listening intently and being open to what happens is what I think makes sense here. Be patient, don't get frustrated and don't quit is the best advice I could offer.
So what should the other belts work on?
Blue Belts: So here I am. I feel pretty good in some positions, but weak in others. My side control top game is solid, but from north south bottom I am weak. My half guard top and bottom feel great, but my guard passing needs a ton of work. After the recent Galvao seminar where he showed a lot of Z Guard, I walked out saying, "Man, I really need to go work that and get a good z-guard". Wrong! Another moment of personal choice and measurement pointing me in the wrong direction.
I need to work on what blue belts need to work on, which is getting solid escapes from everywhere and feeling comfortable (ie I have a plan) in every position. A plan means a plan both offensively and defensively, but on the offensive side, flow is a good direction. A recent comment made by Matt Murdock on the NHB forum where he said "A purple belt beats you softly" demonstrates this nicely. I am not there yet, the key is not to sabotage myself by months of De La Riva and X Guard work at this point.
Purple Belts: I will comment on purple as I have a sense of what that belt is all about even though I am not there yet. For me personally, I anticipate that this will be when I really explore all those areas that I have ignored up to this point. This is when I will pull out the notes from the Galvao seminar and work his reverse DLR sweeps. Sure, it would be fun to work now, but I have more imporant areas to tackle right now. It's a matter of prioritization not ignoring.
Given that I am only a blue belt I feel too distant to comment on any other belts. I think Matt Thornton's article has some great tips on belt progression and traps for students and coaches - worth a read for sure.
So I need a game plan appropriate for my belt level and targeting my weaknesses, how do I build one?
There are six primary positions:
- Mount
- Side Control (including knee ride)
- Back
- Guard (closed, open)
- Quarters/Turtle
- Half Guard
There are three big buckets of work to do in bjj: Escapes, Holding Position, and Submissions (Flows, Counters included). These are the big three where I feel people should spend their time - in that order.
So how does each position relate to concepts like escaping, holding, and submitting?
The key is to look at each position and honestly evaluate yourself (perhaps with the help of a friend or coach). I think everyone should start with escapes and holding for reasons commonly understood in the bjj community. Ask yourself, how good are you at escaping from each position? How good are you at holding each position? Give yourself a score of 1, 2, or 3. The scoring is as follows:
- "1": No game
- "2": Competent
- "3": Rock Solid
Now that you have a baseline evaluation, pick each "1" you have and spend one day drilling that position a week. This means dedicated drilling. Not starting in that position and rolling, but working on that one area for an hour straight. I would drill the escapes and the holding at the same time. They are highly related and you will learn about escapes from holding and visa versa. Once that area (ie. north south) feels like a "2" in both escaping and holding, go back to the "1" list and repeat for another position until everything is a "2" or higher. Then what? Pick the "2"'s and do the same thing until they are all "3"s. See where I am going? Pretty complex stuff huh.
Once you have a strong escape and holding game I would move to the submissions. On the submission front you could use the above scoring method, but I think it would be better to list out common attacks that you hit regularly. This will give you a much better view than say, thinking about what you know and giving a score. It's not what you know, it's what you actually pull off with frequency. Once done, you should have a sense of where you are strong or weak (ie. I never hit an armbar from side control or I never armbar anyone from the guard). This exercise will make it very clear what areas to work on. Once done, I would follow this approach for subs:
- Establish 3-5 sound attacks that you hit often from each position, work til smooth, once done for all positions move to #2...
- Pick a single sub (ie triangle) and learn to hit it from each position, work til smooth, once done for all positions move to #3...
- Go back to each position, map out common resistance to your 3-5, and counters, work until they flow naturally.
Hey this is a personal evaluation - you said we should use an objective measurement to base our development plan?
Yes, the actual plan is not always based on objective feedback. If you can get your teacher to work with you to create or validate your scores that is even better. However, some people don't have a teacher close by or perhaps their teacher isn't willing to spend the time, so a personal assessment here is fine as it is relative anyway. The key is that you are starting within the objective measurement of belt level so you are safe from errors (ie. you're working escapes instead of reverse DLR).
Personal Note:
I guarantee you that as a white belt I thought a lot about submission chains. Why? Because they are cool! They impress your friends, but look at my order above. They are dead last - only worked after I have a rock solid escapes, holding, and a deep submission game. I expect that by the time I get through escapes, holding, and subs as I outline above, I will be several years into a purple belt (just do the math if you don't believe me).
This is the approach I plan to take. If I can follow this plan, I have no doubt the level of my game will rise dramatically. Again I should point out how different this is that the "just train more" model and how it also avoids the pitfalls of working what you like - all in the effort to maximize my precious time.
I hope you enjoyed reading my process and 'd love to hear any comments or suggestions on how to improve it.
See you on the mat!
Paul